Tuesday, July 22, 2014

BS from Main Stream Media about why men stop having sex

I was just looking over this book by Bob Berkowitz and Susan Jager-Berkowitz called Why Men Stop Having Sex.

Why Men Stop Having Sex: Men, the Phenomenon of Sexless Relationships, and What You Can Do About It

Berkowitz was the former White House correspondent from CNN, whose reporting mantras include "Conservatives bad, liberals good." CNN I mean, not Berkowitz.

Anyway, in the book they talk about a bullshit survey they put out on why men stop having sex with their wives. Here's the top reason:

Reason                                                              Percentage
She isn't sexually adventurous enough for me        68%

Here's two more issues buried in the survey:

Reason                                                              Percentage
She has gained a significant amount of weight        38%


I no longer find her physically attractive                32%

See what they've done here. The wife got fat, and/or let herself go, and the man doesn't want to sleep with her any more. Even though the authors state there is some overlap here, this is 70% when you add the two together into: she looks like ass now, and doesn't want to put forth the effort to be attractive any more. That's the number one reason. The two Berkowitzes that wrote this book, are either being purposefully deceptive, or wrote this shit for women and want them to believe that if they put their fat asses in some Victoria Secret undies and buy a trapeze, then their hubbies are going to want to rip their clothes off.

Nothing could be further than the truth. They should have told them to get some Botox and a gym membership, and stop with the deserts. But that would require real effort, and no lazy woman wants to hear that. So they bury the results at the bottom of the survey.

Friday, July 11, 2014

The American Revolution, the First International Conference on Men’s Issues, the British, and the Main Stream Media

When things started warming up in the American Colonies during the beginning of the American Revolution, not all the colonists were on board with revolting against the crown. In fact, maybe 20% of the colonists wanted to revolt, 20% were Tories who supported the Crown, and everyone else just wanted to be left alone. Although the British government could be a pain in the ass sometimes, they were basically benevolent, and did rack up some serious bills protecting the colonies. They had some legitimate points on taxing the colonies. A tax that was only 4% by the way. We pay twice as much as that in sales taxes alone, and our income tax system is horrible.

Ben Franklin was loyal to the Crown, and felt he could speak for the Colonies and patch things up with England. He went to Parliament, but was grilled by them about the Boston Tea party and American reaction to the Stamp Act, and basically treated like crap. In this way, the British alienated Franklin, and with a series of similar outrages on American soil turned the colonists against them, so by the end of the war, it was more like 80% of the colonists hated their guts, and the Tories had to leave. And if there was one guy you didn't want to piss off, it was Ben Franklin. Although he wasn't a young man at the time, he had enormous influence, and was a Polymath. Now, we have another revolution brewing. The men's right's revolution. And this time, the part of the British government will be played by: the Main Stream Media.

How? There was an MRA conference last week, the First International Conference on Men's Issues in Detroit. I had heard about the conference and Paul Elam, but I really didn't think much about it. I agree with Elam on some things, as do I with some of the other speakers at the conference, and the organizers of the conference, but I'm not aligned with them on everything. I was fairly ambivalent about the it.

Then I saw this piece by a twit who writes for Time magazine called,

"I went to the conference in suburban Detroit expecting a group of feminist-hating Internet trolls; I found much more"

Where this piece of Main Stream Media garbage named Jessica K Roy, wrote crap like, 

"Still, being surrounded by men who belly-laughed at rape jokes and pinned evil elements of human nature wholesale on women was emotionally taxing at best and self-destructive at worst. Once, during a particularly upsetting segment of the program, I had to excuse myself from the auditorium to seek refuge on the bug-filled bank of Lake St. Clair. I kept wondering why I had volunteered to fly 600 miles to attend the conference alone, to surround myself not just with crass ideological opponents, but with people with violent Internet histories who believed my very existence oppressed them. "

There's that word violent again (italics mine), connected with the internet and MRAs. What do you mean by violence, Jessica? Were they going around chopping heads off? Were they raping and pillaging? No, they were exercising their right to free speech, and the word violent doesn't belong in the same sentence with talk, or speak, or write, you stupid sack of media garbage.

Here's another jewel from the article, "...Elam published a post to A Voice for Men taking issue with my tweets during the conference, which made clear that I was upset by many of the sentiments expressed."

You don't get to be upset (italics mine) when you're reporting, Miss Shitty. You don't get to be upset, because that Freedom of the Press, that was paid for in blood by the same men you are shitting all over, that freedom is for you to report unbiased facts. Which you are obviously unable to do. Because you're UPSET.  That pisses me off. And you piss me off. 

So here's some more internet violence for you, Jessica Roy. You have absolutely no business being a reporter. You have no business advocating for a cause, or NOT advocating for a cause. Freedom of the press is a sacred right, because of the price good men paid for it. It isn't sacred so that you can be a little bitch making shit up when people are talking about ruined lives at the Men's Issues Conference. It was given to you so you can uncover corruption, like that of the current administration which you helped bring to power, or the Feminist Crap going on in courtrooms across America. The freedom of the press was given to you so you can make this world a better place, not make shit up so you can turn the US into the Feminist, Socialist, Ghetto, Dystopian States of America.

So keep it up, Jessica, and the main stream media. Keep passing those stamp acts, keep making shit up about the men's rights movement, keep getting my taxes raised so I can pay for single moms like the one that was in the checkout line in front of me today, paying with an EBT card,  while I had to make a quarterly payment to the IRS of 15,ooo dollars to pay for her brood of three kids from three different fathers. Keep acting like the British in 1775, Main Stream Media. See what happens next.

And, my ambivalence on the Conference is officially gone. Next year, they'll be getting a fatty check from me, while I have my checkbook out writing checks to the IRS. Put that in a tweet, Jessica.

Thursday, July 10, 2014

An Elementary School Fail in Scottsdale hits home

I found out yesterday, that the elementary school that I went to in Scottsdale Arizona, is going to be closed:


According to the article, the occupancy rate of the school is at 47%. In fact, there are several schools who's occupancy is falling. What's going on? What happened to our overcrowded and underfunded schools? Didn't we need a tax increase in Arizona for education just a few years ago. A look at the school's demographics, tells a clearer tale than any of the MSM stories: Student Demographics for Tonalea Elementary School:

Asian        10 (2%)
Black        33 (6.26%)
Hispanic 301 (57.12%)
Native American 16 (3.04%)
White        167 (31.69%

So the school is seventy percent minorities. Are these representative of the demographics of Scottsdale?
From 2010:

Asian           1%
Black           2%
Hispanic        9%
Native American 3%
White          89%

So we can see obviously, the white population of the school is significantly underrepresented, and probably the reason that they're at 47% occupancy. The take away, is that the local white population, which is over 70% in Tonalea's zip code, is not sending their kids to school. As it is a lower middle class neighborhood (yes, they have them in Scottsdale), the local population is probably home schooling their kids, or scrimping and saving to send them to a private school. While still subsidizing Tonalea with their property taxes. But, not for long. To make things even more convoluted, from a government standpoint, the Scottsdale Unified School District is the second largest employer in the city, and not enough kids to go around.

None of these reasons were mentioned in the MSM stories, like the one the Arizona Repugnant ran of course, such things are swept under the rug, in their little socialist dystopia. If we don't print it, it didn't happen right? The New York Slimes tries to blame this on a Supreme Court decision, where the Court, in 1974 Milliken v. Bradley 'killed any hopes of integrating the public schools.' Actually, the New York Slimes, and their allies on the left killed public schools, and everything they did to make the situation better...forced busing, allowing kids to cross city lines to integrate...made the situation worse. Kinda like all the stimulus packages that their columnist Paul Krugman keeps pushing. They're poster children for Einstein's saying; "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.' The Times is, of course, full of crap. Scottsdale is an affluent suburb, and they got all integrated didn't they? Or not. Minnesota tried to bypass the court decision with an open enrollment program: Oddly enough, they failed. Miserably. But they did manage to wipe out a lot of the suburban schools. Ineterestingly enough, I while researching the article, I saw that the open enrollment had managed to kill off my stepmother's school in Northern Minnesota. From Arizona to Minnesota, failed public school programs! From the Canadian Border, to the Mexican Border, a sea of shining liberal educational and tax dollar destruction. So, to recap: 1) My old elementary school has failed, due to white flight from the public school system 2) The efforts to desegregate by government result in increased segregation, and increases in taxes, hence tax losses 3) This is not a failure of local government, but a failure of municipal, state, and national governments. All are contributors to the disaster. Its not all bad. Eventually the public school system will collapse, and the combination of home schooling and private schooling will give the kids a better education, at no public expense. And then we have the liberal idiots, who actually call their children's school, and complain about this lack of diversity. This idiot calls himself ramspaul, and has disabled comments on this video, which is the way liberals promulgate free speech. Here ramzpaul complains about his daughter's school, and its lack of diversity: This guy must be one of the dumbest people on the planet Earth. You know who he reminds me of? Chevy Chase's character in the first Vacation Movie, who stops in a Ghetto and asks for directions. I went to one of ramzpual's 'diversified' schools after Tonalea, and let me tell you, anybody who has parents that make their kids go to a school like that, should get a visit from CPS. I got my ass KICKED by those punks and thugs. It was BAD. But ramzpaul, in his little white bread, liberal, rainbow world, has no idea of the world of hurt he would put his kid in. What an idiot.

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

SaelPalani I mean Auntie Diana I mean Diana Boston I mean Pansexual...I'm confused, but so is she

I was trolled by this...I don't know. Creature I guess, insulting the Men's Rights Movement. Here are some of her critics:




Here's the critter's blog:

OFFICIAL DIANA BOSTON BLOG Lipstick Pansexual Radical/Socialist Feminist In Your Face


I'm learning all kinds of new words today. What is Pansexuality?


Here's a dude who figured this puzzle out:


In fact, there's a whole list of Diana Boston hate vids:


The only conclusion I can come to, is this woman is like a negative attention vampire, who feeds on the drama.

 By the way, this is not one of them. After seeing her in action, I honestly think this woman is on meds/therapy or both. I actually think that I responded to her troll comment, telling her she was going to end up as a crazy cat lady. Then I found out she was.

Insanity isn't funny. Well in this case, it kinda is.

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Ban Bossy, and the anti-entrepreneur

What is "Ban Bossy?" A campaign by Sheryl Sandberg to ban the word bossy, because of it's "perceived harmful effect on young women." I'm a big fan of censorship by the way. NOT. Maybe she wants to ban the First Amendment too. I'm sure she wants to ban the second one. She only wants to ban freedom of speech when it involves hate speech, such as the word bossy.

How did Sandberg dream up this idiocy? Maybe she was in the executive ladies room at Facebook dropping a deuce. She noticed she was the only one in there and said, "Gee, I'm lonely." Then, up from the porcelain came a voice,

"Ban bossy."

She looked down at the steaming god, and said, "Oh my stars! A feminist."

Anybody who comes up with that steaming turd of an idea, has got to be where they're at by kissing ass. Did she invent Facebook? No. Maybe she was a entrepreneur who started her own company and got bought out by a Silicon Valley giant. Nope. From the Wikipedia article:

"After graduating from business school in the spring of 1995, Sandberg worked as a management consultant for McKinsey & Company for approximately one year (1995-1996). From 1996 to 2001, Sandberg served as Chief of Staff to then United States Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers under President Bill Clinton"


How did that happen? How does a graduate student, after one year, move from a management consulting job to chief of Staff for the Secretary of the Treasury? Does anybody else find this odd? Apparently, she worked for him when Summers was at Harvard, and he hired her as Chief of Staff. With one year of work experience?

She was a privileged kid of rich liberal parents who went to Harvard, talked a good game and shot right to the top of the corporate ladder. The only things missing were entrepreneurial spirit, and common sense. And, she says "It's OK to cry at work."


According to Jezebel, this is the new feminism:

"What was most striking to me in the book was Sandberg's chapter on being emotional at the office, sharing stories of when she cried in front of her coworkers. And she believes it's OK because "sharing emotions builds deeper relationships" 


No. No it's not OK t cry at work. It's not OK for an officer in battle leading his Marines, and it's not OK in my current business. This is a business, you want to cry and yell, and let it out, go on Jerry Springer, or the View, or some other crap. I have clients, and if they see my employees crying and acting irrationally, they'll drop my business faster than you can say, "I'm using my coworkers as emotional tampons."

Corporate America...a place that I was launched into upon exit from the Marine Corps. While the Marines had a few ass kissers and sycophants, it was, for the most part, a meritocracy. But I figured the corporate world would be different. After all, they have to make money to stay afloat right? They have to run a business right? People can be fired for poor performance right?

Ahhh. Well, sort of. Sometimes?

I've had three female bosses since I've gotten out of the Marines. Here are the three types:

1) The hypochondriac dumper. I was working as a programmer/analyst for a small government agency. This woman was an incessant talker, lied her way into the job, and the CIO admitted to me in the elevator that he had hired her because someone upstairs (a woman exec) told him he needed to hire more women in IT. The hypochondriac dumper was allergic to everything but oxygen, completely incompetent, and spent most of her time running a soon-to-fail catering business with her husband on the side. She met him at the emergency room. I'm not kidding. She attempted to dump all her project management duties on me, and went to a lot of meetings where she chatted about gluten free cookies and nodded her head a lot.

She was a certified process improvement master who flew her process into the side of a mountain (what we call a cumulus granite cloud in the aviation community) through a mixture of laziness and incompetence. She (and the CIO) drove the development shop into the ground, and eventually the entire shop was shut down and outsourced. Making me a big believer in process improvement certification. Sorry Drucker, the shit don't work, if management is composed of morons.

2) The jilted lover. This women's husband dumped her and brought a nineteen year old to her class reunion. She was passive-aggressive, forgot about deadlines then flailed at the last minute, was insulting, dressed like a prostitute (and was promoted, probably for that reason) and incompetent. There was no pleasing this woman, because she didn't know what she wanted. I eventually dropped the contract I had with her company because she made it miserable, and they hired me back at a higher rate and moved me somewhere else.

3) The chubby and clueless middle-aged executive who really should have been a housewife. This woman was a VP without a clue, went to meetings constantly but had no idea what her people were working on, or how her division was running. I was hired as a data detective to find out what their product marketing and selling problems were, the most glaring was a crappy web interface, which the IT department had been sitting on for a while. Everyone but her knew about the problem, and I completely wasted my time, and the company's money looking for something that everyone already knew about. She gave no direction, advice, and when I pointed out the primary issue was completely unconcerned. When a new higher ranking executive was hired to clean up some of the messes in her company she went into hysterics, knowing that she might tossed out with the trash.

Does that mean that I haven't had any incompetent boobs that were men? No, there have been plenty. All of the incompetent men have had these traits: Lazy, misdirected, don't know their people, indecisive, scheming, focusing on making themselves look good in front of their execs, instead of doing their jobs.

So the poor women managers shared the same traits as the poor males. The difference is, is that the women are running at a 100% fail rate. The men, are running about 50%. Not great, but at least there are some bright spots. But the workplace has become feminized, men aren't allowed to be direct, which has led to a disappearance of honor in the workplace. I got a call this morning from a client at 6:30 am apologizing to me because one of the other directors called a VP about a data fight. Some little bitch (this is a man actually) crying behind his back about someone peeing in his rice bowl.

Here's what Sandman has to say about it:

No marketing plan, unrealistic expectations, don't listen, can't innovate, can't collaborate, has to have it her way. Here's a list from Beyond Highbrow:

  1. hormonal (read: moody, “that time of the month”)
  2. incapable of leaving their personal lives at home (read: emotional)
  3. only too happy to talk about their staff behind their backs (read: gossipy)
  4. backstabbing (read: manipulative, fake)
  5. loose cannons (need I say more)
  6. feel threatened by colleagues (read: insecure)
  7. sharp tongued (read: bitchy) BOSSY!
  8. too cliquey (read: catty)
  9. too competitive (read: aggressive) BOSSY!
  10. spend too long worrying about their appearance (read: vain)

Is there anything on there that you haven't seen, or surprises you? Not me.

But don't listen to me. Even a feminist publication like the Daily Mail says so:

Men are the best bosses: Women at the top are just too moody (and it's women themselves who say so)


Once again, hormonal, incapable of leaving their personal lives at home and only too happy to talk about their staff behind their backs. 
‘This indicates that while women are more than capable of progressing to a management role, some lack some of the key skills required to be a good boss.
"Female bosses were seen as more temperamental and more likely to get caught up in petty office politics"

"A third have left a job because they didn’t like their boss, and of these, the majority of women claimed they left because of a female manager."

But don't expect that kind of study to be reported from a US media outlet. That's where we have to go to get our news nowadays. Overseas. 

Does that mean that you can't have an all-female business. You can try:

Catfights over handbags and tears in the toilets. When this producer launched a women-only TV company she thought she'd kissed goodbye to conflict...


Here's a bullshit quote from the article, 

"Working in TV is notoriously difficult for women. There is a powerful old boys' network, robust glass ceiling and the majority of bosses are misogynistic males." 

Really. With female centered shows like, Sex in the City, True Blood, and Orange is the new Black? Oprah and the view, oh my! And she makes that claim. What utter crap.

"Oh my stars! A feminist."

What happened with this feminists little experiment with an all female production company. The word Titanic comes to mind. As in the disaster, not the size. They bickered constantly, catfights erupted daily, and the list of bad things was all over the article. Here's a particulary funny quote:

"The effect a lack of testosterone was having in our office was even more apparent when I temporarily hired two male directors to work on a series (camera operators are usually men because of the heavy equipment). The team suddenly became quieter, more hard-working and less bitchy - partly because they were too busy flirting."

Oh, you had to hire men, cause the camera equipment was too heavy. I guess that's kind of bad...in a production company.

What was the end result? They went bankrupt less than two years after forming the company. Must have been the misogyny. Or maybe the cameras were too heavy. Tough to say, really.

Friday, June 20, 2014

The False Rape Culture

Here's a feminist gloating about George Will losing his column in an article titled, "Misogynist George Will DUMPED from major newspaper for horrible rape column!!!


Will's Column was about false rape allegations on campus, and the feminists are horrified that anybody would challenge their flagship political weapon of the rape culture. A part of the column that particularly offended the feminist nasties:

"...when they make victimhood a coveted status that confers privileges, victims proliferate."


Is this a privileged status for women? What do you call it when a 'victim' makes crap up that can ruin a man's life, and there are no repercussions at all when she is outed? I call that pretty privileged.

Will of course, is being punished for speaking the truth. I was recently watching a made for TV movie called Sea Change, which is part of the Jesse Stone stories. In this story, the an 18 year old girl makes a false rape allegation against an older man. The movie paints him as a pervert, because he is older, and the girl the victim, even know they admit that she had given consent. This is complete and utter Hollywood crap. Particularly when they honor people like Micheal Jackson and Roman Polanski, known child molesters. When it's one of their own, they cover their ass of course. Fricken Gerbil racers.

How about a more famous case, the Duke Lacrosse team scandal? The reporting was relentless in the main stream media, hammering the privileged, wealthy, white  jocks, creatures of the patriarchy and bane of feminists everywhere, victimizing a poor girl. Duke starts throwing coaches and players under the bus at the cyclic rate. Until we find out that the poor girl made the who thing up. Then the media went radio silent on the whole affair.

Here's an article in my favorite online publication (NOT), Salon, where the illustrious Laura Miller writes:

"The less-acknowledged tragedy of the Duke lacrosse scandal is the damage it has done to the real victims of rape, who often struggle to be believed even though law enforcement officials estimate that only 8 percent of all rape accusations are false. Mangum’s lurid lies also overshadowed the witnessed and undisputed bad behavior of the players, particularly the ugly sexual and racial epithets they hurled at the dancers. In their rush to judgment, doctrinaire Duke faculty members who pounced on the accusation as “proof “of the racism and misogyny purportedly rampant at Duke ruined any opportunity to discuss those issues constructively, as opposed to merely grandstanding."


Trying to turn the shit back on the players of course, despicable commentary after all they'd already been though. The less-than-illustrious Miller barely mentions the woman that made the crap up, who is at the heart of the matter. Barely a couple of lines, and hints that mental illness caused her to create the mess. And I guess that eight percent of false allegations are OK to her. But we all know that number is a lot higher. Even if it were eighty percent, that would be OK, wouldn't it Laura Miller? Can I call you Laura?

The Wikipedia article on the incident states:

"Soon after the allegations were made, 88 Duke professors (referred to sometimes as the "Group of 88", sometimes referred to as the "Gang of 88") from the Trinity College of Arts & Sciences placed an ad in The Chronicle referring to the circumstances surrounding the allegations as a "social disaster" and quoting primarily anonymous individuals citing racism and sexism in the Duke community. The advertisement concluded, "We're turning up the volume [...] To the students speaking individually and to the protesters making collective noise, thank you for not waiting and for making yourselves heard," and "These are the students shouting and whispering about what happened to this young woman."[24] Notable signatories included Houston BakerMiriam CookeAnne AllisonCathy DavidsonAriel DorfmanMichael HardtAlice KaplanClaudia KoonzPedro LaschWalter MignoloMark Anthony Neal and Alex Rosenberg. The ad was spearheaded by faculty member Wahneema Lubiano."


"In January 2007, many months after the initial print of the ad, a new letter was posted at the Concerned Duke Faculty website signed by 87 faculty members stating that the original ad was misinterpreted.[25] The letter states that the intent of the original ad was to address issues of racism and sexism in the community and not to prejudge the case."


So they created their own social disaster, by backing up the false allegation and piecing together a lynch mob. What happened to Wahneema Lubiano? Nothing. He's still a professor of African American studies at Duke. Untouchable for anything, of course.

Now let me come to the incident that I know about. Twenty years ago when I was an undergrad, a fellow Marine Sergeant who was also a student had a pudgy, unattractive cow follow him around at a party, literally begging him for sex. Eventually he had too much to drink and succumbed to her advances. After the episode she was upset about what she had done, and called him, threatening to end his career because he never called her after the encounter.

Being the Marine that he was, he told her to go to hell.

Six months passed. Then the Tailhook sexual harassment scandal broke, the Secretary of the Navy resigned, and she saw her chance. She walked into the ROTC office on campus and said, "I want to report a rape."

When the local police department went out to interview her on the incident, she told them that she didn't want to talk to them, she wanted to talk to NIS. She had done her research well.  She knew if she talked to the local police, they would find out this was trumped up shit.If she talked to NIS, well, he would be guilty until proven innocent. That's how they rolled.

The local police department did an investigation, and she did admit that she made the whole thing up. Even after that NIS came in and made the Marine's life hell to 'clear his name.' 

After all that, what happened to the lying cow? Nothing. Not a damn thing.

So was she privileged? I would say so. This was the only rape case I know about in college, so false rape allegations are running about 100% in college by my survey sample. Something needs to be done. These women that make this shit up to cause pain to someone, here and in family court need to be punished for their own shitty behavior. Just like anybody else.