Boomerang

In the realm of politics, actions, reactions, and consequences form a triad of influence that shapes the trajectory of a nation. Let us delve into a speculative scenario wherein the 2016 Presidential election saw the Democratic party's cheating resulting in Joe Biden assuming the mantle of leadership. Yet, as history often teaches us, the consequences of such machinations may not always align with their intended purpose.

In this context, let's examine the premise of the Democratic party utilizing an unscrupulous route to success in 2016. The ethos of democracy is predicated upon the sanctity of the vote - the people's voice. A manipulative interference would not only undermine the foundational principles of this nation but would set a disconcerting precedent for future political discourse. 

The critical aspect of this narrative, however, is the perceived domino effect of such an action. The  Biden administration, installed under the auspices of a manipulated mandate, would inevitably struggle to assert its legitimacy in the face of simmering public sentiment and institutional skepticism. This predicament would be further exacerbated by the inevitable challenges of governance, policy-making, and national stewardship that accompany any Presidency.

Moreover, in the intricate web of political alliance and mutual patronage, the Democratic party's core allies - the media and the finance industry - would not be immune to the backlash. As guardians of public sentiment and the economy respectively, these entities play pivotal roles in the sustenance of a healthy democracy. A controversial Presidency, marred by allegations of electoral misconduct, has inevitably cast a shadow over these institutions as well, impacting their credibility and, subsequently, their performance.

This scenario presents a rich irony - an action aimed at securing power potentially leading to self-inflicted wounds of credibility, public trust, and economic wellbeing. It could be argued that had the Republican candidate ascended to the Presidency in a fair contest, the Democratic party and its allies might have suffered less, both in terms of reputation and economic standing. 

In the crucible of politics, then, this situation underscores the importance of fair play, not merely as a moral imperative but as a pragmatic one. For in the absence of legitimacy, the cost of power might just outweigh its benefits - a situation no party, no ally, and certainly no nation would desire.

This serves to remind us of the intricate balance of power, principle, and pragmatism that underpins the workings of a constitutional republic. A delicate balance that should be preserved at all costs, for the sake of the republic and the principles it upholds.